Civil Judge Jun. Div. Munsif (Pre.) Exam., 2008
Held on 21.12.2008 Law Solved Paper
1. The commission to make local investigation can be issued for the purposes of—1. Collecting evidence on a fact
2. Elucidating any matter in dispute
3. Ascertaining the amount of mesne profit
4. Ascertaining the market value of the property
Which of the above are correct ?
- 1, 2 and 3
- 2, 3 and 4
- 1, 2, 3 and 4
- 1 and 2
- 3 months from the date of the decree
- 6 months from the date of the decree
- 1 year from the date of the decree
- 2 years from the date of the decree
3. Assertion : The rule of constructive res judicature is applicable to writ petitions.
Reason (R) : Public policy considerations underlying res judicature also hold true in relation to writ proceedings.
- Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
- Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
- A is true but R is false
- A is false but R is true
- Delhi only
- Kolkata only
- Either Delhi or Kolkata
- Anywhere in India with the leave of the court
- Suits relating to rights to property
- Suits for rents
- Suits for recovery of voluntary payments or offerings
- Suits against dismissals from service
- Sickness of a party, his witness or his counsel
- Non-examination of a witness present in the court
- Non-service of summons
- Reasonable time for preparation of a case
- Along with the plaint
- At the time of giving of evidence
- At the time of framing of issues
- When ordered by the court
- Order 6, R.7, C.P.C.
- Order 6, R.15, C.P.C.
- Order 6, R.17, C.P.C.
- Order 6, R.19, C.P.C.
- Plaint is on an insufficiently stamped paper
- Plaint is not filed in duplicate
- Relief is undervalued in the plaint
- Plaint is filed in a court having no jurisdiction
- Both the parties are entitled to cost from each other
- Both the parties are not to be deprived of costs
- Both the parties are to be deprived of costs
- Both the parties are not entitled to cost from each other
- Discharge of decree
- Execution of decree
- Modification of decree
- Satisfaction of decree
- Xavier Vs. Bank of Canara
- The Visaka case
- Indian Gramophone Co. Vs. Birendra Bahadur Pandey
- Jolly George Verghese Vs. Bank of Cochin
- Salem Advocate Bar Association, Tamil Nadu Vs. Union of India
- Delhi High Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India
- Allahabad High Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India
- Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India
- A suit without service of notice can be instituted generally, with the leave of the court
- (B) A suit without service of notice can be instituted in cases of urgent or immediate relief, with the leave of the court
- In cases of urgent or immediate relief where leave to institute the suit without service of notice has been granted, interim or otherwise ex parte relief can be granted
- No suit under Section 80 can be instituted without the compliance of the requirement of notice
List–I
Set-off
Mesne profit
Indigent
Subsistance allowance
List–II
1. Amount paid by the decreeholder for detention of the judgment-debtor in civil prison
2. Person allowed to file suit or appeal without court fee
3. Adjustment of defendant’s claim with the plaintiff’s claim
4. Gains from property by a person having wrongful possession
Codes :
- a b c d
- 4 3 1 2
- 3 4 2 1
- 2 1 4 3
- 3 1 2 4
(1) Right to file caveat —Section 148-A, C.P.C.
(2) Pauper suit —Section 33, C.P.C.
(3) Privileged document —Section 29, C.P.C.
(4) Powers of appellate court —Section 102, C.P.C.
Codes :
1 only
4 only
1 and 2
2, 3 and 4
Ans : (A)
17. Match List–I with List–II and select the correct answer using the code given below the Lists—
List–I
Restitution afresh
Next friend
Legal representative
Garnishees
List-II
1. Representative of a minor or a plaintiff of unsound mind in a civil suit
2. Person representing the estate of the deceased
3. Debtor of the judgmentdebtor liable for payment or delivery
4. Setting aside ex parte decree and rehearing the case
- a b c d
- 2 3 1 4
- 4 3 2 1
- 4 1 2 3
- 3 4 2 1
- One-fourth
- One-third
- Two-third
- One-half
- By the Judge
- By the Commissioner appointed by the court
- On affidavit
- All of the above
- 15 days of the service of notice
- 9 days of the service of notice
- 7 days of the service of notice
- 6 days of the service of notice
Reason (R) : These areas enjoy special status like the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
- Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
- Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
- A is true but R is false
- A is false but R is true
- State of Nagaland Vs. Rattan Singh
- Maharaja Vikram Kishore of Tripura Vs. Province of Assam
- Zarzoliana Vs. Government of Mizoram
- State of Nagaland Vs. Chung
- Superintendent of Police
- District and Sessions Judge
- District Magistrate
- High Court on the request of the State Government
- Any person committing offences within the local jurisdiction of such Magistrate but not in his presence
- Any person committing offences anywhere, but in the presence of such Magistrate
- Any person within his local jurisdiction for whose arrest he is competent to issue a warrant
- All of the above
List–I
Special Metropolitan Magistrate
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
Judicial Magistrate of Second Class
Assistant Sessions Judge
List–II
1. Imprisonment up to 7 years or/and fine
2. Imprisonment up to 10 years or/and fine
3. Imprisonment up to 3 years or/and fine
4. Imprisonment up to 1 year or/and fine up to Rs. 1,000
- a b c d
- 2 4 3 1
- 3 2 1 4
- 1 4 2 3
- 3 1 4 2
1. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court
2. By the High Court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the accused resides, carries on business or is engaged in a gainful employment
3. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by the High Court in consultation with the State Government concerned
4. If the courts are not subordinate to the same High Court, by that court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced
Which of the above are correct ?
- 1 and 2
- 2 and 3
- 1 and 4
- 1, 2, 3 and 4
Reasons (R) : This extraordinary power is to be used when consideration of public justice justifies its exercise.
- Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
- Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
- A is true but R is false
- A is false but R is true
- Rs. 1,000
- Rs. 200
- Rs. 100
- Rs. 300
Justice Krishna Iyer made this observation in—
- Harnam Singh Vs. State of HP
- Mohd. Sauman Ali Vs. State of Assam
- Sitaram Vs. State of UP
- Jawaharlal Singh Vs. Naresh Singh
- Alteration of charge
- Joinder of charges
- Persons who may be charged jointly
- Error, omission or irregularity in charge
- Theft where the value of the property stolen does not exceed Rs. 500
- Lurking house trespass
- Assisting in the concealment of stolen property of the value not exceeding Rs. 300
- Receiving or retaining stolen property under Section 411, I.P.C. when the value of the property does not exceed Rs. 250
- All The Above
- 1 year
- 2 year
- 3 years
- 4 years
- Ashok Kumar Golu Vs. Union of India
- Babu Pahalwan Vs. State of MP
- Ramesh Vs. State of MP
- Karan Singh Vs. State of HP
- Orders summoning witnesses
- An order of bail granted by a Magistrate
- An order rejecting the plea of the accused on a point which when accepted, will conclude the particular proceeding
- Interlocutory orders which are without jurisdiction and nullities
- He may be acquitted
- He may be convicted only of theft
- He may be convicted of criminal breach of trust
- He may not be convicted of criminal breach of trust
- High Court or Court of Sessions under Section 439, Cr.P.C.
- High Court under Section 482, Cr.P.C.
- Sessions Court under Section 465, Cr.P.C.
- Court of Sessions under Section 438, Cr.P.C.
- Patna
- Bhagalpur
- Gaya
- All of the above
- Section 133, Cr.P.C.
- Section 144, Cr.P.C.
- Section 145, Cr.P.C.
- Section 107, Cr.P.C.
1. District Magistrate
2. Sub-Divisional Magistrate
3. Judicial Magistrate
4. Executive Magistrate duly empowered in this behalf
- 1 and 4
- 2 and 3
- 1, 2 and 4
- 1, 2, 3 and 4
Reasons (R) : They are based on the notion that Judges and Magistrates are not infallible.
- Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
- Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
- A is true but R is false
- A is false but R is true
- Is relevant showing preparation for relevant facts
- Is relevant showing conduct
- Is relevant showing effect of relevant facts
- May be relevant under Section 32 or Section 157 of the Evidence Act
- Not prove this statement
- Prove if it is relevant otherwise than an admission
- Prove it as it is explanatory of conduct influenced by facts in issue
- None of the above
- An admission by a guardian and item against a minor is evidence
- Admission on a point of law made by a pleader in court on behalf of the client is evidence
- Admission by one of the several defendants in a suit against another defendant is evidence
- Admission of fact made by a pleader in court on behalf of his client is evidence
- In criminal cases, previous good character is irrelevant
- In criminal proceedings, previous bad character is relevant
- In civil cases, character to prove conduct imputed is relevant
- In civil cases, character of any person affecting the amount of damages is relevant
- Certifying Authority
- Controller appointed under the Information Technology Act
- Internet Service Provider
- Certifying Authority which had issued digital signature certificate
- Mercantile Bank of India Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India Ltd.
- Madanappa Vs. Chandramma
- Turner Morrison and Co. Vs. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd.
- Sitaram Vs. State of UP
- Section 125, Evidence Act
- Section 124, Evidence Act
- Section 123, Evidence Act
- Section 126, Evidence Act
- Queen Empress V s . Abdullah
- Queen Empress Vs. Babulal
- Queen Vs. Lillyman
- Pakla Narayan Swamy Vs. Emperor
- Five
- Three
- One
- Two
Reason (R) : A receipt is not a contract or grant in respect of which oral evidence is barred.
Codes :
- Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
- Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
- A is true but R is false
- A is false but R is true
0 comments:
Post a Comment